• AILA
  • Newsweek Lawyers
  • Newsweek Lawyers
  • Client Champion
  • NACLE
  • Top 100 Lawyers
  • BBB
  • Expertise
  • Chambers
  • AVVO
  • AVVO
  • Expertise
  • TOP 10 Immigration Attorneys In New York
  • TOP 10 Immigration Attorneys In New York
  • TOP 10 Immigration Attorneys In New York

IRS TAX OFFER IN COMPROMISE LAWYER

If you are having financial difficulty, or a difficult time paying all of your back taxes (especially as a Small Business Owner), hire the best New York City Wall Street law firm that has successfully filed and had approved multiple Offers in Compromise, resulting in final taxes paid of only a small, tiny fraction of the original amount due.

Call us at (212) 968-8600 or toll-free at (855) 207-7660 for a free telephone consultation to see if you qualify.

An offer in compromise (OIC) is an agreement between a taxpayer and the Internal Revenue Service that settles a taxpayer’s tax liabilities for less than the full amount owed. Taxpayers who can fully pay the liabilities through an installment agreement or other means, generally won’t qualify for an OIC in most cases. For information concerning tax payment options including installment agreements, refer to Topic No. 202. To qualify for an OIC, the taxpayer must have filed all tax returns, made all required estimated tax payments for the current year, and made all required federal tax deposits for the current quarter if the taxpayer is a business owner with employees.

In most cases, the IRS won’t accept an OIC unless the amount offered by a taxpayer is equal to or greater than the reasonable collection potential (RCP). The RCP is how the IRS measures the taxpayer’s ability to pay. The RCP includes the value that can be realized from the taxpayer’s assets, such as real property, automobiles, bank accounts, and other property. In addition to property, the RCP also includes anticipated future income less certain amounts allowed for basic living expenses.

Reasons for the Offer

The IRS may accept an OIC based on one of the following reasons:

  • First, the IRS can accept a compromise if there is doubt as to liability. A compromise meets this criterion only when there’s a genuine dispute as to the existence or amount of the correct tax debt under the law.
  • Second, the IRS can accept a compromise if there is doubt that the amount owed is fully collectible. Doubt as to collectibility exists in any case where the taxpayer’s assets and income are less than the full amount of the tax liability.
  • Third, the IRS can accept a compromise based on effective tax administration. An offer may be accepted based on effective tax administration when there is no doubt that the tax is legally owed and that the full amount owed can be collected, but requiring payment in full would either create an economic hardship or would be unfair and inequitable because of exceptional circumstances.

Forms to Use

When submitting an OIC based on doubt as to collectibility or effective tax administration, taxpayers must use the most current version of Form 656, Offer in Compromise, and also submit Form 433-A (OIC), Collection Information Statement for Wage Earners and Self-Employed Individuals, and/or Form 433-B (OIC), Collection Information Statement for Businesses. A taxpayer submitting an OIC based on doubt as to liability must file a Form 656-L, Offer in Compromise (Doubt as to Liability) (PDF), instead of Form 656 and Form 433-A (OIC) and/or Form 433-B (OIC). Form 656 and referenced collection information statements are available in the Offer in Compromise Booklet, Form 656-B (PDF).

Application Fee

In general, a taxpayer must submit an application fee for the amount stated on Form 656. Don’t combine this fee with any other tax payments. However, there are two exceptions to this requirement:

  • First, no application fee is required if the OIC is based on doubt as to liability.
  • Second, the fee isn’t required if the taxpayer is an individual (not a corporation, partnership, or other entity) who qualifies for the low-income exception. There are two alternative options for qualifying. The first is that the individual’s adjusted gross income, as determined for the most recent taxable year for which such information is available, falls at or below 250 percent of the poverty guidelines published by the Department of Health and Human Services. The second is that the household’s gross monthly income x 12 months falls at or below 250 percent of the poverty guidelines published by the Department of Health and Human Services. For both options, section 1 of Form 656 contains the Low-Income Certification guidelines to assist taxpayers in determining whether they qualify for the low-income exception. A taxpayer who claims the low-income exception should complete section 1 of Form 656 and check the certification box.

Payment Options

Lump Sum Cash Offer – Taxpayers may choose to pay the offer amount in a lump sum or in installment payments. A “lump sum cash offer” is defined as an offer payable in 5 or fewer installments within 5 or fewer months after the offer is accepted. If a taxpayer submits a lump sum cash offer, the taxpayer must include with the Form 656 a nonrefundable payment equal to 20 percent of the offer amount. This payment is required in addition to the application fee. The 20 percent payment is generally nonrefundable, meaning it won’t be returned to the taxpayer even if the offer is rejected or returned to the taxpayer without acceptance. Instead, the 20 percent payment will be applied to the taxpayer’s tax liability. The taxpayer has a right to specify the particular tax liability to which the IRS will apply the 20 percent payment.

Periodic Payment Offer – An offer is called a “periodic payment offer” under the tax law if it’s payable in 6 or more monthly installments and within 24 months after the offer is accepted. When submitting a periodic payment offer, the taxpayer must include the first proposed installment payment along with the Form 656. This payment is required in addition to the application fee. This amount is generally nonrefundable, just like the 20 percent payment required for a lump sum cash offer. Also, while the IRS is evaluating a periodic payment offer, the taxpayer must continue to make the installment payments provided for under the terms of the offer. These amounts are also nonrefundable. These amounts are applied to the tax liabilities and the taxpayer has a right to specify the particular tax liabilities to which the periodic payments will be applied.

Upon acceptance of an OIC, the taxpayer may no longer designate offer payments to any tax liability specifically covered in the offer agreement.

Suspension of Collection

Ordinarily, the statutory time within which the IRS may engage in collection activities is suspended during the period that the OIC is pending, for 30 days immediately following the IRS’s rejection of an OIC, and for the period in which a timely appealed rejection is being considered by the IRS Office of Appeals.

Offer Terms

If the IRS accepts the taxpayer’s offer, the taxpayer will have agreed to fully comply with the tax laws. Additionally, any refunds due within the calendar year in which the offer is accepted will be applied to the tax debt. If the taxpayer doesn’t abide by all the terms and conditions of the OIC, the IRS may determine that the OIC is in default. For doubt as to collectibility and effective tax administration OICs, the terms and conditions include a requirement that the taxpayer timely file all tax returns and timely pay all taxes for 5 years from the date of acceptance of the OIC. When the IRS terminates an OIC, the agreement is no longer in effect and the IRS may then collect the amounts originally owed (less payments made), plus interest and penalties.

Right to Appeal

If the IRS rejects an OIC, the taxpayer will be notified by mail. The letter will explain the reason that the IRS rejected the offer and will provide detailed instructions on how the taxpayer may appeal the decision to the IRS Office of Appeals. The appeal must be made within 30 days from the date of the letter.

Return of an Offer

In some cases, an OIC is returned to the taxpayer rather than rejected, because the taxpayer didn’t submit necessary information, filed for bankruptcy, failed to include a required application fee or nonrefundable payment with the offer, hasn’t filed required tax returns, or hasn’t paid current tax liabilities at the time the IRS is considering the offer. A returned offer is different from a rejection because there’s no right to appeal when the IRS returns the offer. However, once cured, the offer may be submitted again.

Additional Information

Step-by-step instructions and all the forms for submitting an OIC are in the Offer in Compromise Booklet, Form 656-B (PDF). You may use the Offer in Compromise Pre-Qualifier tool to confirm your eligibility and prepare a preliminary proposal. Additional information about the OIC program is available in Publication 594, The IRS Collection Process (PDF) and in Offer in Compromise.

ATTORNEY PROFILE

Attorney Rahul Manchanda

Professor, Author, and Attorney Rahul Manchanda worked for one of the largest law firms in Manhattan where he focused on asbestos litigation. At the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (“UNCITRAL”) in Vienna, Austria, Mr. Manchanda was exposed to international trade law, arbitration, alternative dispute resolution, and comparisons of the American common law with European civil law.

Attorney Bio

Online Video

VISIT OUR VIDEOS.
The Manchanda Law Office

The Manchanda Law Office And Associates PLLC 30 Wall Street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10005
Phone: (212) 968-8600

CLIENT TESTIMONIALS

OUR REPUTATION PRECEDES US

“Thank you, Rahul. I feel so lucky to work with you. Have a good night.”

Thank you everybody yes – yesterday I got receipts…God bless you everybody.

Obedient Regards,

“Since I have been dealing with the Manchanda Law Office And Associates PLLC, I feel very good that my case is being followed up on each day. I am getting weekly updates of letters, and of your contacts, and I’m being included in possible strategy which I feel is good… You have shown great determination to help me with this matter and you have always been sincerely professional and always helpful.” – Ruel Hanley, Staten Island New York

“I appreciate very much your legal representation and thank you for representing my case personally.” – Dr. Sanga Kothapa, Santa Ana California

“Rahul, I appreciate your work on my case. Thankful for the very well prepared drafts…Also thanks for suggesting me in some good directions. Thanks.” – Naveenkumar C., Talahassee Florida

“Mr. Manchanda did a fantastic job! To carry the ball for hours like that was remarkable. Must be a great advocate.” – Kelly (McLean, VA)

“It was a very good experience to have an Attorney-Client relationship with your esteemed law firm. Thanks and highest regards.” – Muhammad Tariq, New York, New York

“Your Excellency Mr. Rahul Manchanda, I was so impressed by the way you handled my case. I am % satisfied by not only on the resolution but also on the process…I wish you all the best.” – Ermias, New York, New York

  • Fox News Lawyer
  • CNN
  • Newsweek
  • Nancy Grace
  • CourtTV
  • NewsMax Lawyer
shopify visitor statistics